In article <FDw2M8.ADC@news2.new-york.net>,
blazeg@my-deja.com wrote:
> In article <FDqHC7.619@news2.new-york.net>,
> "JW" <jswillis75@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Does anyone else feel frustrated....knowing the potential health and
> social
> > benefits of nanotechnology, but realizing at the current rate, those
> > benefits may be decades away? ...
> >...
> > WHAT CAN WE DO????
>
>...
> Then you have the fact that most of the scientific community still
> see's Drexler's vision of Molecular Nanotechnology as, at the very
> least fringe science.
>
> Many obsticals...very little time.
>
>
Personally I think one of the main obsticales out there is not so much as unawarness but more self awarness if that makes sense to you. What I am talking about is that each company, each government, each researcher is researching towards their own goals in hope of their own private profits from this technology instead of going at it as a unified force trying to get to a goal that will benefit all mankind. Just think of all the research time lost doing redundant work that someone else has already done if we can get organized as a world and start working toward common goals we will see the arival of this technology much faster.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.